Don’t Rush the Wrong Hire
- Michelle Kemp

- Jul 10
- 2 min read

There is an old saying that patience is a virtue. In leadership hiring, patience is also a strategy and a signal.
The pressure to move quickly during a search is real and understandable as program continuity, team momentum, and the compounding need for resolution are legitimate drivers. Yet some of the most costly hiring mistakes are not made because an organization moves too slowly. They are made when the strategic work that separates a deliberate hire from a reactive one is rushed.
So what does this mean for hiring managers? Before any candidate is evaluated and a role is posted, internal work sets the foundation for genuine alignment on what the role actually needs to accomplish. We’ve shared before the importance of defining competencies on paper and in practice, keeping the role and culture transparent throughout the process, and ensuring organizational readiness to successfully onboard and support a new leader. This planning requires reflection, candor, and realistic expectations grounded in team capacity and organizational goals. Skipping that work to accelerate a search does not save time. It defers the cost to a harder moment: when the hire does not land as everyone hoped, and you find yourself starting over.
The same care extends to the candidate experience. How an organization runs its search is the first impression a candidate has of its team and how it operates. If a process is slow, opaque, or disorganized, it can cost you the person you want to hire and shape the organization’s reputation long after the search closes. Incorporating the candidate experience from the start isn't an extra step. It's part of the same intentional pace that leads to the right hire and often what convinces that person to choose you. The decision to stay starts before day one.
A question for any organization in the middle of a search is not “how quickly can we fill this?” It is:
Where are we being genuinely thorough, and where are we trading rigor for speed?
Have we done the internal work that helps us recognize the right person when we meet them?
What is our process signaling to the candidates we most want to hire and retain?
Speed fills a seat. Intention fills the role.



Comments